Menu Close
Tusk
☆☆☆☆☆
Code Generation & Assistants (176)

Tusk Verified Tool

Front-end code generation and automation for tickets.

Last Update: August 18, 2026

Visit Tool

Starting price Discontinued June 10, 2026

Tool Information

Tusk is an AI tool designed to facilitate the process of making front-end changes to product tickets without requiring coding skills from product managers. It generates code from Jira to production, allowing users to quickly implement simple front-end modifications in their GitHub repository. One of Tusk's notable features is automated triaging, which identifies tasks that the tool can write code for and tracks their progress until completion.

Starting price: Discontinued June 10, 2026. Features, limits, credits, seats, billing periods, taxes, regional availability, and promotions can change, so confirm the current official checkout or sales quote.

Business automation should be tested with controlled access documented inputs human approval monitoring and current employment privacy or compliance requirements.

F.A.Q (20)

Tusk was an AI testing platform that generated and maintained unit API and integration tests using code changes live traffic and business context.

No. The tool officially sunset its product on June 10 2026. The website remains available for the shutdown notice and historical documentation.

The company said the team was winding down the tool and continuing its mission at a larger scale but did not present the old product as continuing independently.

The former Free Team and Enterprise pricing is historical and should not be treated as an active offer after the shutdown.

The tool said it would remove the GitHub App which automatically uninstalls it from connected GitHub organizations.

The shutdown notice states that historical pull requests and pull request comments remain in place. Teams should still preserve records needed for audit or maintenance.

The official notice instructs users to uninstall the the tool Drift SDK from services and delete the CI workflow that ran Drift tests.

The company stated that customer support would continue for one month after the June 10 2026 sunset date.

The tool recommended Cognition’s Devin for test automation and code review and linked to a migration guide. Teams should compare alternatives independently.

CoverBot was designed to backfill unit tests and help teams increase coverage in existing codebases.

The tool Drift used recorded traffic as context for creating test cases intended to represent real requests and regressions.

Yes. The former product generated executable tests that could run locally or in continuous integration workflows.

The historical Enterprise plan listed a self-hosting option along with SAML SSO and vendor security review.

The former pricing listed a $0 individual tier and a 14-day Team trial but those plans are no longer active because the service ended.

The archived pricing page listed $50 per month per active developer. This is historical pricing not a current offer.

Tests already committed to a repository may remain usable but teams must inspect dependencies licenses CI references and assumptions before maintaining them independently.

No. Generated tests needed engineers to verify assertions edge cases fixtures security implications and whether tests measured the intended behavior.

Preserve generated test code configuration billing records security documentation support exchanges and any evidence required for compliance or future migration.

No. New teams should evaluate currently supported testing tools because the tool has been discontinued.

The official the tool website publishes a post titled “the tool Is Sunsetting” dated June 11 2026 with the closure and migration details.

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Historically generated unit tests from code changes
  • Generated API and integration tests
  • Used live API traffic as test context
  • Connected business context to test generation
  • Ran generated tests locally or in CI
  • Self-iterated when generated tests failed
  • Maintained tests as business logic changed
  • Helped identify regression risks in pull requests
  • Supported code coverage goals
  • Offered a CLI setup workflow
  • Provided CoverBot for backfilling tests
  • Integrated with Jira and Linear on paid plans
  • Included observability and monitoring features
  • Supported self-hosting on its Enterprise plan
  • Offered SAML and SSO for Enterprise customers
  • Published security assurance including SOC 2 Type II
  • Left historical pull requests and comments in place after shutdown
  • Published migration guidance to Devin

Cons

  • The Tusk product was discontinued on June 10 2026
  • New customers can no longer rely on the former plans
  • The GitHub App is being removed from customer organizations
  • Tusk Drift users must remove the SDK and CI workflow
  • Support continued only for one month after shutdown
  • Historical pricing pages are no longer an active offer
  • Generated tests still required human review
  • Live traffic can contain sensitive data
  • Generated tests can encode incorrect assumptions
  • High coverage does not guarantee meaningful behavior coverage
  • CI execution added compute time and maintenance
  • Repository access required a security review
  • Self-healing tests could hide unintended behavior changes without oversight
  • Migration to another product requires workflow changes
  • Historical documentation may remain online after service closure
  • Existing teams must preserve required artifacts before access ends

Reviews

You must be logged in to submit a review.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review!

Quick actions
Visit Tool