Menu Close
Casetext
☆☆☆☆☆
Legal Assistants (23)

Casetext Verified Tool

Casetext is associated with legal research and CoCounsel capabilities for reviewing, summarizing and analyzing legal material. Legal professionals should verify every authority and quotation, protect privileged data and retain lawyer control of strategy and filings.

Last Update: August 20, 2026

Visit Tool

Starting price Custom pricing

Tool Information

Casetext is associated with legal research and CoCounsel capabilities for reviewing, summarizing and analyzing legal material. Legal professionals should verify every authority and quotation, protect privileged data and retain lawyer control of strategy and filings.

Use authorized, non-sensitive inputs and grant only necessary permissions. Configure privacy, retention, sharing, accessibility, disclosure, export, moderation and spending controls. Test representative cases, verify facts, calculations, citations, code and media, preserve originals and require accountable human approval before publishing or taking operational action.

Current commercial access is handled through Thomson Reuters and sales-led plans rather than a stable Casetext self-service amount. Products, seats, jurisdictions and contract terms determine custom pricing.

AI output may be inaccurate, biased, derivative, insecure or misleading. Review consent, copyright, training and retention terms, renewals, refunds, platform rules and applicable law. Legal, financial, education, employment, identity, healthcare and customer-facing workflows require qualified human review.

F.A.Q (14)

Casetext is associated with legal research and CoCounsel capabilities for reviewing, summarizing and analyzing legal material. Legal professionals should verify every authority and quotation, protect privileged data and retain lawyer control of strategy and filings.

Use authorized, non-sensitive inputs and grant only necessary permissions. Configure privacy, retention, sharing, accessibility, disclosure, export, moderation and spending controls. Test representative cases, verify facts, calculations, citations, code and media, preserve originals and require accountable human approval before publishing or taking operational action.

Verified pricing: Custom pricing. Current commercial access is handled through Thomson Reuters and sales-led plans rather than a stable Casetext self-service amount. Products, seats, jurisdictions and contract terms determine custom pricing.

No permanent free plan was verified.

It is intended for people or organizations that need the specific workflow described in this listing. Suitability depends on the supported inputs, outputs, integrations, limits, and required level of human control.

Confirm currency, billing period, automatic renewal, usage or credit limits, seats, exports, integrations, taxes, refunds, cancellation, privacy terms, and commercial rights at checkout.

Yes. AI-generated analysis, text, media, code, recommendations, transcripts, or metadata can contain omissions, bias, artifacts, and false information and must be checked against authoritative sources.

Provide only authorized and necessary data after reviewing encryption, model training, subprocessors, retention, deletion, access controls, and applicable privacy requirements.

No. Human direction, factual checking, quality assurance, subject expertise, and professional review remain necessary, especially for consequential decisions.

Commercial rights vary by plan, input ownership, generated assets, model, provider terms, and jurisdiction. Verify the current license and third-party rights before publication or resale.

No official public affiliate or referral program was verified during this review.

Yes. App-store country, device, taxes, introductory offers, and renewal pricing can produce different amounts.

Yes. Promotions, credits, plan names, model access, and renewal rates can change, so check the final checkout screen.

The official destination, visible pricing information, documentation, and relevant app-store listing were reviewed on August 20, 2026.

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • The former Casetext experience now routes users to Thomson Reuters CoCounsel
  • Combines legal research; analysis; and drafting workflows
  • Connects answers to authoritative legal sources
  • Can show supporting sources and reasoning for review
  • Integrates with Westlaw content
  • Integrates with Practical Law resources
  • Supports document review and summarization
  • Can compare agreements and identify relevant provisions
  • Helps draft legal correspondence and work product
  • Supports Microsoft 365 integrations
  • Can connect with document-management systems
  • Extends beyond legal work into tax; audit; and accounting workflows
  • States that customer prompts and content are not used to train shared models
  • States that model partners are contractually prohibited from training on customer content
  • Uses zero-retention provider API arrangements according to Thomson Reuters
  • Allows organizations to configure retention
  • Supports user deletion subject to organizational policy
  • Encrypts data in transit with TLS 1.2 or better
  • Encrypts data at rest with AES-256 according to security materials
  • Provides regional hosting options for several markets
  • Benefits from Thomson Reuters legal content; support; and enterprise infrastructure
  • Can reduce time spent on first-pass research and repetitive document tasks
  • Keeps the professional responsible for the final judgment rather than marketing fully autonomous legal decisions

Cons

  • Casetext is no longer a distinct standalone product in the form many older reviews describe
  • Old Casetext pricing; features; accounts; and tutorials may be obsolete
  • Current access is tied to Thomson Reuters CoCounsel products and contracts
  • No simple public price is displayed for many configurations
  • Legal AI can hallucinate cases; holdings; quotations; citations; or procedural facts
  • Every authority must be opened and checked for validity; jurisdiction; treatment; and currency
  • A source citation does not prove that the model interpreted the source correctly
  • Confidential and privileged documents require firm-approved configuration and matter controls
  • US processing or third-party model routing may conflict with some client or jurisdiction requirements
  • Regional hosting availability does not automatically satisfy every localization rule
  • Organization-configured retention may prevent an individual user from deleting data immediately
  • Integrations with email and document systems expand the permissions and breach impact
  • Poor prompts or incomplete document sets can produce misleading conclusions
  • The system cannot replace lawyer competence; supervision; client communication; or ethical duties
  • Unauthorized-practice and professional-liability risks remain with the user and organization
  • Coverage and capabilities vary by subscription; jurisdiction; and content license
  • Westlaw or Practical Law integration can increase vendor dependence
  • Generated drafts can contain invented facts; overbroad language; or omitted exceptions
  • Sensitive personal; health; financial; criminal; or trade-secret data require minimization
  • Courts and clients may require disclosure or restrict AI use
  • Billing time saved does not automatically translate into lower client cost or better outcomes
  • Security certifications and encryption do not eliminate insider; configuration; credential; or supply-chain risk
  • Tax and accounting outputs also require authoritative verification
  • Procurement and deployment can be complex for small firms
  • Users migrating from legacy Casetext must confirm data export; retention; and matter continuity
  • The product provides professional assistance; not legal advice to the public or a guarantee of a correct result

Reviews

You must be logged in to submit a review.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review!

Quick actions
Visit Tool